{"id":546,"date":"2014-03-09T21:45:15","date_gmt":"2014-03-09T21:45:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesax.info\/makesandmodelslist\/?p=546"},"modified":"2014-03-09T21:46:58","modified_gmt":"2014-03-09T21:46:58","slug":"early-conns-horns-1916","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/early-conns-horns-1916\/","title":{"rendered":"Early Conns: Horns Before 1916 \u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more--><br \/>\nI had an e-mail conversation with Mark Overton (of <a href=\"http:\/\/saxophone.org\">saxophone.org<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/saxquest.com\">saxquest.com<\/a>) regarding the earliest Conns. &nbsp;He pointed out some things that are interesting and confusing and some inaccuracies I made on my original Conn pages on saxpics.com. &nbsp;I decided it&#8217;d be something that I should give more attention to, so I&#8217;m writing here.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s start with the horns, themselves.<\/p>\n<p>The earliest Conn saxophone that most people have seen is the beautiful <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/?v=gal&amp;a=1057\" target=\"_blank\">s\/n 16 horn<\/a> that&#8217;s at saxpics.com. &nbsp;Let me point out a few defining characteristics:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/conn16b.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Bell keys are on the left side (as you&#8217;re playing) of the horn.<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/2.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">A rather interesting G#\/C#\/B\/Bb cluster.<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/3.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">A single wire low C keyguard, rather than the Mercedes-Benz-like one that we&#8217;re used to.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I also want you to keep in mind the <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/4.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">neck angle<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/conn16c.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">the engraving<\/a>, and what&#8217;s stamped on the bell:&nbsp;&#8220;Made by C. G. Conn Elkhart Indiana and Worcester, Mass.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I do tend to agree with Mr. Overton that the next oldest Conn horn on saxpics.com, this <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/?v=gal&amp;a=1056\" target=\"_blank\">bare-brass horn<\/a> that the owner guesstimated was from 1890, is close enough to the s\/n 16 horn in appearance to not make enough of a difference. &nbsp;The obvious thing I could point out was that the 1890 horn has the <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/5.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Mercedes-Benz-like keyguard on the low C<\/a>. &nbsp;Of course, the 1890 horn doesn&#8217;t have pearl keytouches and doesn&#8217;t have engraving even close to as elaborate as on the s\/n 16 horn, but this is purely cosmetic. &nbsp;Conn probably offered the pearls, plating and engraving at extra cost. &nbsp;Recently, I found another Conn from about this same era. &nbsp;Other than the plating change, the 1890 horn looks identical to this <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/gallery3\/Conn\/Worcester-All-Series\/288\" target=\"_blank\">silver (possibly nickel) s\/n 288 horn<\/a>, so I&#8217;d definitely say Mr. Overton is right about these three horns being the same model.<\/p>\n<p>The big question comes from looking at <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/?v=gal&amp;a=1058\" target=\"_blank\">this s\/n 182 horn<\/a>. &nbsp;The neck is significantly different from the other horns and it also seems to have a reinforcement patch on the underside. &nbsp;Is it a completely different model? &nbsp;Well, compare it to this <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/?v=gal&amp;a=1059\" target=\"_blank\">s\/n 266 horn<\/a>. &nbsp;The neck on s\/n 266 looks like the one on the 1890 horn and s\/n 16 horn.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Overton theorized that the Worcester and Elkhart plants did things a little differently. &nbsp;Indeed, the s\/n 182 horn is stamped JUST <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Elkhart, Ind.&#8221;<\/a>&nbsp;and the s\/n 266 horn is stamped&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/i-2.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Elkhart Indiana and Worcester, Mass.&#8221;<\/a>&nbsp; Combining this with the fact that the 1890 horn has two necks, so Conn might have offered a few neck choices, Mr. Overton argues that all these horns are the same model. &nbsp;Hey, you can also compare the engraving on the 16, 182, and 266 horns and they&#8217;re pretty much identical. &nbsp;I can agree with this.<\/p>\n<p>(One other point about these really, really early Conns: James Noyes argues quite well, in his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=%22conn%20saxophone%22%20%22gold%20medal%22%201915&amp;source=web&amp;cd=5&amp;ved=0CFAQFjAE&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamesnoyes.com%2Fpdf%2FLefebre_FULL.pdf&amp;ei=ZDNxT9znBM_62AXkkKHeDg&amp;usg=AFQjCNHz3X8Rr4CeGWU0clXG0itnWpRSEA\" target=\"_blank\">Doctorate thesis<\/a> (pp. 122-127) , that the first American saxophone was built for Conn in 1890; not an earlier date.)<\/p>\n<p>But wait. &nbsp;There&#8217;s more.<\/p>\n<p>At some point, Conn switched from the <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/conn16b.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">single-side-bell-key configuration<\/a> to the <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/14166_761_570.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">split-bell-key configuration<\/a> that they used until the 1930s. &nbsp;The highest s\/n I&#8217;ve seen on the single-side bell key altos is <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/gallery3\/Conn\/Worcester-All-Series\/288\" target=\"_blank\">288<\/a>. &nbsp;The lowest s\/n I&#8217;ve seen on the split-bell-key altos is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.saxophone.org\/museum\/saxophones\/specimen\/720\" target=\"_blank\">382<\/a>. &nbsp;Note that this is just on ALTOS. &nbsp;On tenors, the&nbsp;highest s\/n I&#8217;ve seen on the single-side bell key horns is&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.saxophone.org\/museum\/saxophones\/specimen\/617\" target=\"_blank\">432<\/a>. &nbsp;The lowest s\/n I&#8217;ve seen on the split-bell-key tenors is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/gallery3\/Conn\/Worcester-All-Series\/37xx\" target=\"_blank\">37xx<\/a>. &nbsp;(Sorry I don&#8217;t have a larger sample size; they&#8217;re fairly uncommon.)<\/p>\n<p>It is definitely possible that the switch-over date is 1893\/4. &nbsp;Why? &nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/buescher\/truetone\/index.htm\" target=\"_blank\">FA Buescher left Conn<\/a>&nbsp;on <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=l_hGarjpO9QC&amp;pg=PA229&amp;dq=%22cg+conn%22+saxophones&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=w_9wT9nYJYaesQKJtKjQDg&amp;ved=0CFgQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;q=%22cg%20conn%22%20saxophones&amp;f=false\" target=\"_blank\">September 23, 1893<\/a> and founded the &#8220;Buescher Mfg. Company.&#8221; &nbsp;At the very least, that&#8217;s a good argument for a changeover date.<\/p>\n<p>But wait. &nbsp;There&#8217;s still more.<\/p>\n<p>At some point, Conn switched their G# cluster design from the <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/2.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">original style<\/a> to the <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/saxpics.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Buescher-style&#8221;<\/a> design. &nbsp;The earliest horn I can confirm that has the Buescher-style cluster is &#8230; <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/?v=gal&amp;a=1033\" target=\"_blank\">474x<\/a>. &nbsp;That&#8217;s approximately 1901. &nbsp;Do note, though, that this horn still has the <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-content\/gallery\/conn_worcester_stuff\/d.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">split octave key design<\/a>. &nbsp;The earliest &#8220;unified&#8221; octave key mechanism I see on an alto is this <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/?v=gal&amp;a=1028\" target=\"_blank\">940x horn (1905)<\/a>. &nbsp;According to <a href=\"http:\/\/people.usd.edu\/~mbanks\/CONN7.html#union\" target=\"_blank\">Margaret Downie-Banks<\/a>, 1906 was the year that Conn started producing saxophones with the Union label, so I think a 1905\/1906 date would be about correct for this changeover.<\/p>\n<p>But there&#8217;s still more &#8230;.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/conn\/newinvention.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Quoting myself quoting other people<\/a>, &#8220;There was a fire on May 22, 1910 that destroyed the Conn plant. The plant was rebuilt in short order, though, and Conn produced a limited edition of horns for the rest of the year to celebrate their rebirth: the New Invention model.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is where I leave you &#8212; at least, for a little while. &nbsp;I&#8217;ve got to do some more research: I was initially under the impression that &#8220;New Invention&#8221; only applied to horns that were, well, a bit special, like the gold-plated baritone with additional pearl inlay and a microtuner neck that I <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/conn\/newinvention.htm\" target=\"_blank\">posted on saxpics.com.<\/a>&nbsp; Mr. Overton has a bunch of documentation that I haven&#8217;t seen before and I&#8217;ve found a couple other sources, too. &nbsp;I&#8217;ve got to play with some interesting model names that contain &#8220;Wonder&#8221; and\/or &#8220;New Invention.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Intermission &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Well, that was somewhat successful.<\/p>\n<p>There was a comment I saw repeated in several places that Conn exhibited New Invention horns at the 1915 San Francisco World&#8217;s Fair (<a href=\"http:\/\/musicaviva.com\/store\/ebooks\/display.html?book=Conn1915Sax\" target=\"_blank\">see this<\/a>, for example). &nbsp;Those comments proved to be incorrect. &nbsp;I found a 1915 <em>Music Trade Review<\/em> magazine online. &nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=panama%20pacific%20exhibition%20of%201915%20%22cg%20conn%22&amp;source=web&amp;cd=7&amp;ved=0CFcQFjAG&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmtr.arcade-museum.com%2FMTR-1915-60-25%2FMTR-1915-60-25-48.pdf&amp;ei=rC1xT-PyHLHfsQKtv_DCDg&amp;usg=AFQjCNEcWXXbySdFvilUwupOOcYUVMkbPQ\">Quoting<\/a>: &#8220;Considerable attention is being attracted by the samples of the New Wonder &#8230;.&#8221; &nbsp;I think the 1915 &#8220;New Invention&#8221; comment came from an article that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.saxgourmet.com\/conn__saxophones.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Steve Goodson wrote regarding Conn history<\/a>. &nbsp;On my <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/conn\/\" target=\"_blank\">original saxpics.com pages<\/a>, I noted several places where Mr. Goodson&#8217;s remarks diverged from other accounts and how there were some date inaccuracies.<\/p>\n<p>Because Conn&#8217;s a bigger name in brasswinds than saxophones, I did a couple searches on a few different brasswind websites and on eBay: all the mentions of &#8220;New Invention&#8221; I found were 1910-1911 (for example, this <a href=\"http:\/\/cderksen.home.xs4all.nl\/ConnNICircusBore1911image.html\">New Invention cornet<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Overton indicates that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.saxophone.org\/museum\/publications\/id\/53\" target=\"_blank\">this New Invention catalog<\/a> is from 1914, but Musica Viva says that the same catalog is <a href=\"http:\/\/musicaviva.com\/store\/ebooks\/display.html?book=Conn1915Sax\" target=\"_blank\">from &#8230; 1915<\/a>. &nbsp;I&#8217;ll cross-reference with Mr. Overton in awhile to find out how he dated his copy.<\/p>\n<p>It is <em>possible<\/em> that Conn did have some New Invention saxophones available WITH the Wonder line after 1911. &nbsp;I say this because I saw a few inconsistencies in the design of some saxophones post-1910. &nbsp;However, I know that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.saxpics.com\/the_gallery\/conn\/wonder\/bari\/silverngold\/18696-405\/\" target=\"_blank\">this s\/n 18696 (1911) bari<\/a> is a New Invention because it&#8217;s got that bit of decorative trim on the top crook, which is identical to what&#8217;s in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.saxophone.org\/museum\/publications\/id\/53\" target=\"_blank\">New Invention catalog (p. 4)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So, the current breakdown is:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>No Mercedes-Benz keyguard: 1888 to 1890 (say, s\/n 1-50)<\/li>\n<li>Mercedes-Benz keyguard, single-side bell keys: 1890-1893 (say, s\/n 50 to 300)<\/li>\n<li>Split-bell-key, original-style G# cluster: 1893-1898 (say, s\/n 300 to 3000) &nbsp;I have a hunch this change arrived with the 1898 World&#8217;s Expo.<\/li>\n<li>Split-bell-key, &#8220;Buescher-style&#8221; G# cluster: 1898-1904 (say, s\/n 3000 to 9000)<\/li>\n<li>Split-bell-key, unified octave key mechanism: 1905-1910 (say, s\/n 9000 to 17800)<\/li>\n<li>New Invention, late 1910-?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I still need to find out if there are saxophone versions of Wonder, Wonder Improved, Wonder Perfected and\/or Perfected Wonder. &nbsp;Ahh, the joys of research.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Intermission &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>(I&#8217;ll try to get pictures and links when I have my data drive in hand.)<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve done a fairly lengthy survey of eBay and other websites and the latest horn someone calls a &#8220;New Invention&#8221; is from 1913. &nbsp;Of course, considering the majority are from 1910 to 1912, it&#8217;s possible that &#8220;1913&#8221; is a &#8220;different&#8221; reading of the Conn serial number chart.<\/p>\n<p>I also did research on the &#8220;Perfected Wonder&#8221; name. &nbsp;There was actually a clarinet model called that and that&#8217;s interesting: in the past I had only seen that name applied to brasswinds. &nbsp;In any event, &#8220;Perfected Wonder&#8221; referred to something special: the clarinets, for instance, had an &#8220;improved&#8221; fingering system, some of the trombones sported a rather interesting piston valve, etc.<\/p>\n<p>I could not find any reference to &#8220;Perfected Wonder&#8221; and &#8220;sax&#8221; outside the mention I made on saxpics.com &#8212; which was to correct myself in calling the Virtuoso Deluxe-finished horns &#8220;Perfected Wonder&#8221; &#8212; and the mention on saxophone.org. &nbsp;I can&#8217;t find any reference outside of saxophone.org to &#8220;Wonder Perfected.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Another Wonder name I found in research was &#8220;Victor,&#8221; which seems to have been applied to some New Wonder brasswinds. &nbsp;A person commenting on all the variations of &#8220;Wonder,&#8221; essentially said, &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t worry about it too much. &nbsp;They&#8217;re all Wonders.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So, my opinion is that,<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The original series of Conn instruments, up until 1910, were called &#8220;Wonder&#8221; models. &nbsp;If you want to append the &#8220;Improved,&#8221; I think you can support that with Conn advertisements and catalogs. &nbsp;If you want to append or prefix &#8220;Perfected,&#8221; I think you&#8217;re wrong, especially because these are early 1900s instruments: the clarinets I saw were from 1904.<\/li>\n<li>There definitely is a series of horns called &#8220;New Invention.&#8221; &nbsp;My opinion, based on the comments I&#8217;ve seen on a few dozen websites, is that they were produced from very late 1910 to definitely 1912, possibly early 1913. &nbsp;I will look at actual saxophones from around this time to see what the actual physical or cosmetic differences are. &nbsp;(The big thing to look at is that G# cluster.)<\/li>\n<li>I&#8217;m still waiting for Mr. Overton to comment on how he dated the New Invention catalog on saxophone.org. &nbsp;I didn&#8217;t see a copyright date in the catalog.<\/li>\n<li>The &#8220;Wonder&#8221; models were again produced after late 1912\/early 1913 to about 1915, when Col. Conn sold the company and the New Wonder models were introduced. &nbsp;The New Wonder horns, of course, have toneholes created using the Haynes patent (i.e. US 1119954, December 8, 1914) and are stamped as such. &nbsp;No patent stamp = Wonder. &nbsp;That&#8217;s simple, at least.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&#8212; Intermission &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>So, looking through the pictures I have of Conn Wonders, I came across <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/?v=gal&amp;a=1029\" target=\"_blank\">this little gem.<\/a>&nbsp; You can&#8217;t really see much interesting until <a href=\"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/blog_pics\/310sax3.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">this pic<\/a>. &nbsp;What you&#8217;ve got is a Conn sporting a patented <a href=\"http:\/\/saxpics.com\/buffet\/evette-schaeffer.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Evette &amp; Schaeffer set of plateau keys<\/a>. &nbsp;I&#8217;d love to say, &#8220;Well, this horn&#8217;s obviously an Evette &amp; Schaeffer stencil.&#8221; &nbsp;It&#8217;s not. &nbsp;Not only are the keyguards very different, it&#8217;s got a Conn serial number. &nbsp;I have heard before that there were some instruments that were imported under a European manufacturer&#8217;s name to get around some duty fee, as looks to be the case for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.saxpics.com\/the_gallery\/buffet\/misc\/15057_Conn_doubleoctave\/\" target=\"_blank\">this horn<\/a>, which is a Conn Wonder that has both an importer&#8217;s name (Carl Fischer) and a European manufacturer&#8217;s name (Evette &amp; Schaeffer, again) engraved on it. &nbsp;However, the presence of BOTH of these horns <em>suggests<\/em> that Conn had some sort of collaboration with Evette &amp; Schaeffer. &nbsp;I haven&#8217;t seen any hard documentation on that to back my theory up, but it is interesting.<\/p>\n<p>Anyhow, back to the Wonders and New Inventions. &nbsp;I started thinking about one other piece of keywork missing from earlier horns: the G# trill key. &nbsp;I <em>think<\/em>&nbsp;this addition came out for the New Invention, because I see it on horns with a serial number of 20,000 and later. &nbsp;However, I don&#8217;t <em>consistently<\/em> see it. &nbsp;I do know that some repair techs disable the spring for the G# trill or remove it entirely, just like some disable the fork Eb vent key or solder on a piece of brass over the tone hole. &nbsp;That might be the only real difference between the two models. &nbsp;There may have been the option for additional pearl inlay and\/or more elaborate engraving, but that&#8217;s cosmetic.<\/p>\n<p>CG Conn sold the company in 1915. &nbsp;If you want to call the New Invention horns anything produced from 1911 to 1915, that&#8217;s OK. &nbsp;I don&#8217;t have enough photographic evidence to dispute that, as far as saxophones go, at least.<\/p>\n<p>So, on to the rewrite of this page!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":548,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"iawp_total_views":2,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,192],"tags":[191,33,190],"class_list":["post-546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-conn","category-early-conns-horns-before-1916","tag-a-soprano","tag-conn-2","tag-wonder-improved","excerpt","zoom","full-without-featured","even","excerpt-0"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=546"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":549,"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546\/revisions\/549"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassic-sax.info\/Pete\/makesandmodelslist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}