German Saxophones & The Nazi Party
German Saxophones & The Nazi Party

German Saxophones & The Nazi Party

For years now the Internet has been rife with statements, rumours, supposed “facts”, and half-truths about what the German Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei’s (Nazi party’s) view on the saxophone was. The majority of things I’ve read indicate that the saxophone was banned in Nazi Germany, yet the Swastika-engraved saxophones produced in Germany, by German saxophone manufacturers, for German military bands would suggest that at least some form of saxophone playing was allowed and/or tolerated.

Swastika engraving on saxophone bell, saxophone, German saxophone, German eagle, silver sax
G.H. Hüller tenor sax, # 37316 Source: Lowboy on warrelics.eu/forum

Zer vill be no sax playing here… Unless it does not sving

A couple of weeks ago I happened across an article in the October 7, 1933 edition of The Milwaukee Journal, which would indicate that the Nazi party was OK with the saxophone.

Nazi Views on the Saxophone, Oct. 7, 1933, The Milwaukee Journel, newspaper article, saxophones in Germany, OK, so someone got a key element of the story wrong. Adolphe Sax was not German, but in fact Belgian. Nonetheless, this article made me very curious, and I began to do some research to see if I could find something that explained this article in The Milwaukee Journal.

Rather than relying on any Internet sources, I went to a couple of books I have on the history of the saxophone. The first is a title most readers are likely familiar with: The Devil’s Horn, by Michael Segell. Although Segall mentioned the saxophone’s history in 1930s-40s Germany, unfortunately he offered nothing that could explain this 1933 article.

The second book I consulted is titled The Saxophone, and was written by former professional saxophone player, turned Professor of Music at City University of London, Stephen Cottrell. Success!

Cottrell has written quite a lot about Nazi/saxophone relations. Furthermore, being an academic, Cottrell has so many end notes in his book that I could be chasing them down for months to come.

In a nutshell Cottrell explains that:

  • Germany became intolerant of jazz after the Nazi party came to power in 1933, because correctly or not, jazz became associated with black musicians.
  • By extension therefore, the instrument that symbolized jazz—the saxophone—was also not tolerated anymore.
  • Many German sax players stopped playing altogether, and some even sold their horns.
  • It wasn’t uncommon for Nazi storm troopers to knock the mouthpieces out of the mouths of sax players playing at dances, and for some SS branches to ban the the use of the saxophone altogether.
  • In 1933 German saxophone manufacturers were already starting to feel the economic effects of the Nazi party’s anti-saxophonism. Saxophone sales were slumping, so manufacturers applied to the new government for help.
  • And there in lies the rub: This is where government ideology and the economic well-being of companies didn’t coincide, so the Nazi party had to figure out a compromise.

German saxophones get a reprieve

  • In September 1933 the following press release was circulated:

‘Rescuing the Honour of the Saxophone’

As a result of the petition of May 10, 1933, The Economics Ministry has been in contact with the Reich Administration in order to avoid a boycott of the saxophone, which could result from the ban on so-called Negro music. The Reichs Ministry for Education and Propaganda answered that the saxophone bears no responsibility for Negro music. It is an invention of Adolf Sax, born November 6, 1814, and is mainly used in military music […]. As with all other instruments, one can play good music with the saxophone. A ban on Negro music is no obstacle to continued use of the saxophone. A pertinent newspaper notice to this effect will be released.
Source: The Saxophone, Stephen Cottrell p. 324

It is worth noting how the press release spelled “Adolph”, this was not a typo. It was quite deliberate.

It should also be noted that the above quote was originally in German, and was translated into English as part of a 2004 dissertation about the saxophone in Germany.

The “pertinent newspaper notice” mentioned in the above quote from September 1933, must be what the October 7, 1933, Milwaukee Journal article is based on. It would be interesting to see if I could find the original German press release. I have not yet tried to check any German newspaper archives.

Given my interest in vintage German saxophones, I find this era of their existence quite fascinating. It would be easy to slap a simple, they were banned—as was swing/jazz music—label on that period of saxophones in Germany. On the other hand, that vintage G.H. Hüller, C.A. Wunderlich, et al. saxophone that you have in your closet, or that you play everyday, might just have had a very interesting past.

…this is just my blog. My “real” website is www.bassic-sax.info. If you’re looking for sax info, you should check it out too.There’s lots there!
 

6 Comments

  1. Theo

    I guess that the saxophone was never banned in Germany.
    Most incidents of saxophone bashing can be seen as the initiative of lower officials and bully’s.

    At the end of 1933 the Reich Chamber of Music started as an exclusive guild for musicians.
    There policy was a ban on certain people and there music not on instruments.
    The petition of May 1933 is 3 months after the change of government and does not mention that there is an official saxophone ban.

    1. Interesting Theo. I plan to do some research on the 1933 Reich Chamber of Music.

      The other thing that I would love to track down, is the 2004 thesis on the history of the saxophone in Germany. I doubt that it is available electronically through. I submitted my Master’s thesis in 2003, and at the time my university did not require an electronic copy, but only 3 paper copies.

      I don’t have Stephen Cottrell’s book at my finger tips ATM, and I can’t recall the exact title of the thesis, nor the author or the university he attended. I’ll do some digging around though, and post any info about the availability as a further comment here.

        1. That’s it! Thank you.

          Interesting. Just out of interest I checked, and my university (St. Francis Xavier) does not have my thesis converted to PDF. It is only available in hardcopy in the 2 different libraries on campus. I guess we were not as technologically as forward-thinking as Arizona was. :up:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 192 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Verified by MonsterInsights